WHERE TO GO RACING... IF YOU DON'T LIKE RACING.
Back in 1937 John Betjeman immortalised the line “Come friendly bombs and fall on Slough!” in print. Nearly seven decades on, the temptation to suggest he should have directed his apocryphal payload nine and a half miles further down the road to Ascot racecourse instead is all too great for your correspondent.
Of the hundred or more trips I have made to a racecourse since resuming my racegoing activities in 1998, I have little hesitation in nominating my trip to the Berkshire venue for the first day of the festive meeting last Friday as the least satisfying of the lot… and bear in mind that this itinerary has included everything right down the food chain to thinly-contested late Spring Midlands point-to-points in driving rain.
Windsor had proven a most capable substitute for Ascot when I partook of this two-day meeting two years ago, comfortably playing host to the swollen crowds eager to see the likes of Baracouda and Crystal D’Ainay slug it out around the figure of eight’s tight track and soft - but perfectly acceptable, and accepted – racing surface. As Friday afternoon wore on, I couldn’t help but increasingly dwell on how sadly missed as a National Hunt venue the Thameside track undoubtedly is.
I never went to Ascot before its highly publicised and widely criticised rebuild, so to a certain extent I have to take the word of the semi-regulars I bumped into who decried that, not for the first time in recent months, getting on for half of the advertised food, drink and entertainment outlets were not in use.
Likewise an ex-Sportsman colleague, back with his previous employers Timeform following the demise of the short-lived daily paper, assured me that the venue was always among the very worst for getting a good view of horses long enough to take the physical conformation notes required of him (even when not especially full as on this occasion), and that since the rebuild it has got worse still.
My problems with Ascot, however, include some that I suspect have been extant since before the rebuild.
The National Hunt course’s situation inside the Flat equivalent, itself of course necessarily wide to cope with the sizeable fields come the Royal Meeting, renders watching racing there a notably detached, impersonal, alienating spectacle. I didn’t have the foresightedness to gauge the distance from the foot of the stands to the far side of the Flat track, but learning it to be 100 metres or further away would not have surprised.
The knock-on effect for viewing (or not viewing) the rest of the jumps circuit, not much short of 1m6f in length, is easy enough to guess, therefore, and dependency on the giant video screen beside the winning post – itself requiring binoculars to view to any great extent – becomes all the more so, or on a gloomy day such as this maybe even absolute.
Little of this would matter so much were the excessive distance away from the action the spectator has to contend with compensated for by a place in the stands of suitable trajectory, a compensation fellow Berkshire track Newbury offers in spades. Not Ascot, though: never have I encountered a racecourse that guards its best views of the track with such zeal.
“General Admission” (for which read Tattersalls) customers are afforded a stand in name only, barely higher off the ground at its highest than other noted low-slung equivalents at smaller tracks in the country, e.g. Stratford. Swinley Bottom, of course, has its name for a reason, and as the ground falls away down the back straight, so it becomes absolutely impossible to draw even the most tentative ideas from the General stand as to what is occurring as the runners reach that part of the course.
Several attempts at getting even the most fleeting of glimpses from a higher floor of the main stands complex were all thwarted by either the strategic positioning of boxes (Royal and corporate) and the manifold posses of civil but utterly unbending security people.
All in all this was far from the best or most rewarding use I’ve ever put £21 worth of entry fee to (inclusive of a staggering £7 car parking charge), and that’s before the stellar prices for even a simple sausage baguette and chips from what looked to be the cheapest of those eateries – of those that were open - is taken into account. At least the hot toddy seller was contrite enough to label his larger glasses of mulled wine (£7.50 a pop) as “obscene” rather than just “large”… at least, I hope it was contrition.
