NEVER A DULL MOMENT AT HEREFORD – EVEN WHEN IT’S BARELY OPEN
Nobody
likes being talked about in front of their faces rather than being talked to,
and on that basis one can only guess what those who hold Hereford Racecourse
dearest to their hearts made of the currently semi-retired venue cropping up,
directly or indirectly, in a couple of Racing Post articles this week.
Thursday’s
[October 24th, page 8] edition of the trade paper noted that the
self-styled “Classic Country Racecourse”, last used for National Hunt action on
December 16th of last year, was once more foremost in owner Arena
Racing Company’s thoughts, but not with any obvious view to expediting the
return of Rules action there that so many of us crave.
Rather,
ARC’s gaze had been directed squarely towards the centre of the course,
earmarked as the site of a driving range – replete with 10 metre-high fencing,
floodlights and a shop – by Halo Leisure.
Emergent
threats of development of the racecourse site for the pursuit of anything other
than racing were perhaps always likely once ARC deprived it of Rules action,
but Halo’s interest actually dates far further back than last year’s sad
sequence of events, planning permission for the range having been granted to
the Herefordshire and Bridgend-based concern in spring 2010 before issues of
planning permission started to delay matters.
Of
course, golfing facilities in the middle of racetracks are neither unheard of nor
usually especially much of a hindrance.
Three of Fakenham Golf Club’s 18 holes are situated entirely within the
West Norfolk tracks’s tiny confines, likewise nine of Southwell Golf Club’s
holes have a circuit of plastic railings around them (as well as more sand outside
the bunkers than in!). Ludlow looks more
like a golf course half-disguised as a racing venue than the other way round,
but functions equally well as either amenity; whilst Sandown Park somehow
manages to accommodate three nine-hole tests and a 33-bay driving range,
without their combined fixtures and fittings detracting from the racegoers’
viewing experience to any extent.
Conversely,
ARC appears to harbour fears that any infield development of the Hereford site
(and certainly that of the magnitude proposed by Halo) will deprive racegoers
of the currently untrammelled view of the back straight.
In so
far as elevation off the ground for spectators at this venue compares unfavourably
to, say, Sandown, where the main viewing area sits on a higher point of the
circuit than the back straight, it’s a fair concern. From a relatively low step on the grandstand
at the Esher track, one can see right over the golfing furniture and enjoy the
runners streaming over the Railway Fences et al pretty much unimpeded. From the equivalent position at Hereford, it
would be most unlikely.
It’s
just a pity, however, that nothing about ARC’s intervention – solicitor’s
letter to Herefordshire Council and all – apparently details more explicitly just
why so much concern is being invested in keeping the view of the entire circuit
clear of new developments such as those proposed.
Is
there a credible buyer for the venue waiting in the wings, one whose interest
would be tested sorely if it at least a quarter of the circuit they’d be buying
suddenly became invisible to paying customers by any means other than aerial
viewing? Alternatively, has the ongoing,
often fitful dialogue between Company and Council actually progressed behind
closed doors to the point that the former’s long-requested lease of up to 125
years on the course may be on the verge of being granted?
Time
will tell – this is surely not an investment of effort on ARC’s part without
some deeper reason underpinning it.
***
Racing
has not, as many of you will know, come to a total halt at Hereford since the
cessation of National Hunt action, and having been an enthusiastic visitor to
the venue for some years previously the Arabian Racing Organisation opted to
stage no fewer than six of its 12 full racedays (as opposed to its additional single
races appended to Rules cards) here in 2013, including the season’s concluding
event on September 28th.
With
one fixture apiece also at Taunton and Newbury, eight of the ARO’s racedays thus
take place at either National Hunt or dual-purpose tracks, in addition to seven
of the nine single races.
It is
set against the backdrop of this evidence that the ARO’s Racing Management team
this week announced the discontinuation of its Open Race events for former
Rules horses (usually one or two per fixture, and anywhere between 5f and 2m in
distance), citing the types of racecourse used for ARO meetings as being
ill-suited to the speedy, purpose-bred mostly ex-Flat performers who contested
such events.
That
statement as it stands assumes a very linear interpretation of what Rules
horses are and aren’t capable of – don’t many Flat-bred animals cope perfectly
adequately with National Hunt tracks in bumpers, over hurdles and even over
fences?
In any
event, whilst more likely to be possessive of changes of actual and tactical
speed than their Arab counterparts, “speed” is still a very relative concept
when considering the type of animals that are permitted to take part in Open
Races at ARO fixtures – Thoroughbreds with a British Horseracing Association
handicap rating of just 42 or less (72 or less over the sticks).
Frankel
this lot ain’t. The Delyth
Thomas-trained Jiggalong, four times a winner and once second from five outings
in 2013 to emerge as the season’s outstanding Open Race competitor, had never
rated higher than 61 in an extensive Rules career (despite winning two minor
handiaps) and left that sphere on the lowest of low ebbs in mid-2011 having
failed to run up to her mid-40s rating on any of six outings that year. This season’s second best Open Race horse,
Imagery, beat just five home and never ran to a Racing Post rating
higher than 29 in three middle-distance maidens for Ron Harris in summer 2012.
Just
how fast is it thought that the likes of Jiggalong and Imagery could pelt around
the Herefords of this world, then, that constitutes such a risk to themselves
and others?
This
writer has a great fondness for the ARO and very much most of what it stands
for. It puts on affordable and
characteristically different racedays with a relaxed atmosphere, and it evidently
equips its employees very well for their future careers - Huntingdon/Warwick
Cleark of the Course Sulekha Varma, BHA judge Di Clark, Racecourse Steward
Charlie Corbett and commentator Gary Capewell all honed their respective crafts
at Arab fixtures.
All of
which renders this pronouncement - admittedly not the only reason cited for the discontinuation, with a lack of sufficient viable sponsors being another - a little short of the usual vision and
well-founded common sense one has come to expect of this organisation. Above all else, it also leaves around 50
ex-Rules horses, most bought specifically for ARO Open Races, facing an uncertain
2014 as their adopted mode of racing enters its winter recess.